Scientist Sees Squirrel:eldom original. Usually incorrect. Sporadically interesting.

Scientist Sees Squirrel:eldom original. Usually incorrect. Sporadically interesting.

The writing that is best in technology documents

Over a couple of years ago now, over in the Tree of lifestyle we blog, Jonathan Eisen posted “The most useful writing in technology documents: Part I”. I stumbled across that post and searched excitedly for Part II – simply to discover there clearly wasn’t one. And so I composed one (which Jonathan kindly allow me to guest-post here). It is gotten a good little bit of attention, which will be fun – so that it’s time We posted it right here.

I’m nevertheless titling it “Part II”. Jonathan’s component we > , and I also agree (although my bits that are favourite from his). But Jonathan wondered if picking Nabokov (an acclaimed novelist) was “a bit unjust” in which he later on said he’d never done a Part II because other examples had been way too hard to locate! Actually, other examples are available, and not just within the documents of researchers who’re additionally achieved novelists. We obtained several within my current paper “On whimsy, jokes, and beauty: can writing that is scientific enjoyed”. As an example, the following is Nathaniel Mermin on a result that is surprising quantum mechanics:

“There are no real grounds for insisting that Alice assign the value that is same an observable for every mutually commuting trio it belongs to – a necessity that will certainly trivially make her task impossible. The way when the nine-observable BKS theorem brings Alice to grief is much more simple than that. Continue reading Scientist Sees Squirrel:eldom original. Usually incorrect. Sporadically interesting.